<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Mouthinator Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mouthpublicrelations.com/blog/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mouthpublicrelations.com/blog</link>
	<description>We Are. Your Voice. Marketing and public relations commentary and discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 05:19:47 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on What Makes Me Shoot by The Mouthinator</title>
		<link>http://www.mouthpublicrelations.com/blog/834/comment-page-1#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mouthinator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 05:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mouthpublicrelations.com/blog/?p=834#comment-131</guid>
		<description>Thank you Cindy!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Cindy!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Makes Me Shoot by cindy</title>
		<link>http://www.mouthpublicrelations.com/blog/834/comment-page-1#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>cindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mouthpublicrelations.com/blog/?p=834#comment-130</guid>
		<description>Great posting! I&#039;ve never see nice post as this. 
=============================================
Please visit my website：
http://www.airforce1web.com Wholesale NIKE Air Force One  AF1 shoes.
MSN: xiaobixiang04@hotmail.com 
Email: pt0334@yahoo.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great posting! I&#8217;ve never see nice post as this.<br />
=============================================<br />
Please visit my website：<br />
<a href="http://www.airforce1web.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.airforce1web.com</a> Wholesale NIKE Air Force One  AF1 shoes.<br />
MSN: <a href="mailto:xiaobixiang04@hotmail.com">xiaobixiang04@hotmail.com</a><br />
Email: <a href="mailto:pt0334@yahoo.com">pt0334@yahoo.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Michael Jackson:  The King of Pop Has Stopped by Gladys</title>
		<link>http://www.mouthpublicrelations.com/blog/michael-jackson-the-king-has-stopped/comment-page-1#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Gladys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 09:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mouthpublicrelations.com/blog/?p=792#comment-109</guid>
		<description>First of all - Michael Jackson was ACQUITTED of all charges.That means his defence prooved that there was REASONABLE DOUBHT. Why wasn&#039;t the evidence enough to convince a jury - even if it was enough to convince a mind like yours? 

Secondly of all - in YOUR American culture,  everything innocent (like  friends shraing a bed) will be construed negatively in your SEX-mad society. In Asia (where i come from) it is pretty normal. People can sleep together as a form of closeness - and that all there is to it. We don&#039;t call uncles who hug nieces and nephews and fall asleep on the bed paedophiles. Not everything is construed sexually in some cultures. 

Thirdly  - the world does not know Farrah - (May she  rest in peace).The world,  from Kuala Lumpur to Mumbai, from Bucharest to Tokyo knows MJ. That&#039;s why a suuden death like MJ&#039;s can shock the world. Farrah was dying - it was expected. And she did not command the world&#039;s attention the way your &quot;so-called paedophile&quot;. Perhaps you should stop focussing on MH&#039;s eccentricities  and go after the REAL, murderous paedophiles out there in your country.  Gladys (Kuala Lumpurm MALAYSIA)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all &#8211; Michael Jackson was ACQUITTED of all charges.That means his defence prooved that there was REASONABLE DOUBHT. Why wasn&#8217;t the evidence enough to convince a jury &#8211; even if it was enough to convince a mind like yours? </p>
<p>Secondly of all &#8211; in YOUR American culture,  everything innocent (like  friends shraing a bed) will be construed negatively in your SEX-mad society. In Asia (where i come from) it is pretty normal. People can sleep together as a form of closeness &#8211; and that all there is to it. We don&#8217;t call uncles who hug nieces and nephews and fall asleep on the bed paedophiles. Not everything is construed sexually in some cultures. </p>
<p>Thirdly  &#8211; the world does not know Farrah &#8211; (May she  rest in peace).The world,  from Kuala Lumpur to Mumbai, from Bucharest to Tokyo knows MJ. That&#8217;s why a suuden death like MJ&#8217;s can shock the world. Farrah was dying &#8211; it was expected. And she did not command the world&#8217;s attention the way your &#8220;so-called paedophile&#8221;. Perhaps you should stop focussing on MH&#8217;s eccentricities  and go after the REAL, murderous paedophiles out there in your country.  Gladys (Kuala Lumpurm MALAYSIA)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Michael Jackson:  The King of Pop Has Stopped by julie Fitz</title>
		<link>http://www.mouthpublicrelations.com/blog/michael-jackson-the-king-has-stopped/comment-page-1#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>julie Fitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 05:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mouthpublicrelations.com/blog/?p=792#comment-104</guid>
		<description>M Jackson= nutcase; pedaphile who killed himself w/drugs
Farrah Fawcett=Real talent, decent person, tragic death
   WHY Could She not get equal Press Time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M Jackson= nutcase; pedaphile who killed himself w/drugs<br />
Farrah Fawcett=Real talent, decent person, tragic death<br />
   WHY Could She not get equal Press Time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ruth Madoff, Eva Braun or Meg Ryan? by Bond</title>
		<link>http://www.mouthpublicrelations.com/blog/ruth-madoff-eva-braun-or-meg-ryan/comment-page-1#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Bond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mouthpublicrelations.com/blog/?p=653#comment-96</guid>
		<description>why do you hate Meg so?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why do you hate Meg so?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ruth Madoff, Eva Braun or Meg Ryan? by Ruth Frieband</title>
		<link>http://www.mouthpublicrelations.com/blog/ruth-madoff-eva-braun-or-meg-ryan/comment-page-1#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruth Frieband</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mouthpublicrelations.com/blog/?p=653#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Hey Larry,
Good take on how the pubic perceives Ruth Madoff.  Personally, I think she should be sitting next to her husband, Bernie/Adolf, in jail waiting to be sentenced as well.  
As a side note, my family lost much of our money in Madoff&#039;s Ponzi scheme and even though it&#039;s &quot;only money&quot;, it does sting.  Although, I am a believer in poetic justice.
Ruth (Frieband)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Larry,<br />
Good take on how the pubic perceives Ruth Madoff.  Personally, I think she should be sitting next to her husband, Bernie/Adolf, in jail waiting to be sentenced as well.<br />
As a side note, my family lost much of our money in Madoff&#8217;s Ponzi scheme and even though it&#8217;s &#8220;only money&#8221;, it does sting.  Although, I am a believer in poetic justice.<br />
Ruth (Frieband)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chastity “Son” Bono by Dr. Blogstein</title>
		<link>http://www.mouthpublicrelations.com/blog/chastity-%e2%80%9cson%e2%80%9d-bono/comment-page-1#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Blogstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 22:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mouthpublicrelations.com/blog/?p=635#comment-90</guid>
		<description>She&#039;s having a procedure that we, in the medical community, call an Addadiconmy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She&#8217;s having a procedure that we, in the medical community, call an Addadiconmy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bring On the Buxom Babes, BEA! by John Spalding</title>
		<link>http://www.mouthpublicrelations.com/blog/bring-on-the-buxom-babes-bea/comment-page-1#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>John Spalding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 14:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mouthpublicrelations.com/blog/?p=523#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Brilliant. I&#039;d also like to see carnival freaks and gladiator death matches featuring heads of publishing houses. Shouldn&#039;t require much convincing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant. I&#8217;d also like to see carnival freaks and gladiator death matches featuring heads of publishing houses. Shouldn&#8217;t require much convincing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What President Ford Thought of Sara Jane Moore by Geri Spieler</title>
		<link>http://www.mouthpublicrelations.com/blog/what-president-ford-thought-of-sara-jane-moore/comment-page-1#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Geri Spieler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 22:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mouthpublicrelations.com/blog/?p=514#comment-82</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Justin: 

You and I know the whole story, so I&#039;ll just share some of my thoughts with you. 


I want to thank Matt Lauer for not giving away all the official, unofficial and exotic details of my book.  

As the author of, “Taking Aim At the President,” I reveal the unpleasant, hidden, unpopular, unseemly, talented, warm, generous and quizzical side to this West Virginia woman who ended up on that sidewalk 40 feet away from the sweat-beaded forehead of the President of the United States.  

Lauer may have been surprised to find out that our U.S. Secret Service, Federal Bureau of Investigation and the San Francisco Police Department had her in custody the day before she shot at Ford which was Sunday, Sept. 21.  They all knew she had a gun and all knew she had threatened President Ford. 

Lauer also never questioned the repeated inconsistencies during the show about how far that bullet came to hitting Ford’s head? One reporter said several feet and another said it just missed.

Which is it? 

According to my book and the official record---she missed his head by a mere six inches, and for that we are thankful. 

Had Sara Jane shot at Ford with her own gun, a .44 Charter Arms Revolver, she would have hit him between the eyes.   Her gun had been confiscated the day before by the SFPD.  She bought a .38 revolver she had never used before. As she drove from the gun dealer, she loaded it in her lap while racing down Highway 580 towards San Francisco. 

What she didn’t know is that the sight was off.  The FBI, Secret Service, Judge Samuel Conti and the SFPD will all tell you the same thing: If she had been using her own gun, history and lives would be different.  

President Ford told me, in 2003, he believed Sara Jane escaped all the different protective agencies because they didn’t talk to each other.  He compared the slip to the lack of communication during the 9-11 disaster and his fear was that lack of communication will continue as agencies are reluctant to give up power. 

Someone as complicated as Sara Jane Moore deserves serious inquiry---as she did not then, and would not now;  raise any alarms on any street corner in the U.S. today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Justin: </p>
<p>You and I know the whole story, so I&#8217;ll just share some of my thoughts with you. </p>
<p>I want to thank Matt Lauer for not giving away all the official, unofficial and exotic details of my book.  </p>
<p>As the author of, “Taking Aim At the President,” I reveal the unpleasant, hidden, unpopular, unseemly, talented, warm, generous and quizzical side to this West Virginia woman who ended up on that sidewalk 40 feet away from the sweat-beaded forehead of the President of the United States.  </p>
<p>Lauer may have been surprised to find out that our U.S. Secret Service, Federal Bureau of Investigation and the San Francisco Police Department had her in custody the day before she shot at Ford which was Sunday, Sept. 21.  They all knew she had a gun and all knew she had threatened President Ford. </p>
<p>Lauer also never questioned the repeated inconsistencies during the show about how far that bullet came to hitting Ford’s head? One reporter said several feet and another said it just missed.</p>
<p>Which is it? </p>
<p>According to my book and the official record&#8212;she missed his head by a mere six inches, and for that we are thankful. </p>
<p>Had Sara Jane shot at Ford with her own gun, a .44 Charter Arms Revolver, she would have hit him between the eyes.   Her gun had been confiscated the day before by the SFPD.  She bought a .38 revolver she had never used before. As she drove from the gun dealer, she loaded it in her lap while racing down Highway 580 towards San Francisco. </p>
<p>What she didn’t know is that the sight was off.  The FBI, Secret Service, Judge Samuel Conti and the SFPD will all tell you the same thing: If she had been using her own gun, history and lives would be different.  </p>
<p>President Ford told me, in 2003, he believed Sara Jane escaped all the different protective agencies because they didn’t talk to each other.  He compared the slip to the lack of communication during the 9-11 disaster and his fear was that lack of communication will continue as agencies are reluctant to give up power. </p>
<p>Someone as complicated as Sara Jane Moore deserves serious inquiry&#8212;as she did not then, and would not now;  raise any alarms on any street corner in the U.S. today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What President Ford Thought of Sara Jane Moore by Dr. Blogstein</title>
		<link>http://www.mouthpublicrelations.com/blog/what-president-ford-thought-of-sara-jane-moore/comment-page-1#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Blogstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 21:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mouthpublicrelations.com/blog/?p=514#comment-80</guid>
		<description>I saw it and despite her grandmotherly look, she wasn&#039;t very likable.  She appears to be the same disillusioned nut job that fired that shot thirty something years ago.

And I LOVE Get Smart!  Would you believe, I like Get Smart?  How about mildly enjoy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw it and despite her grandmotherly look, she wasn&#8217;t very likable.  She appears to be the same disillusioned nut job that fired that shot thirty something years ago.</p>
<p>And I LOVE Get Smart!  Would you believe, I like Get Smart?  How about mildly enjoy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

